Calling Grandma Bell?

Does the telco need to do its own big local phone deal to stay competitive? That's the industry mantra at least one analyst is repeating in the wake of the proposed SBC-Ameritech merger.

The proposed SBC-Ameritech deal puts renewed pressure on AT&T Corp. to make a big move into the US local phone business, and may clear the path for the telco to make a blockbuster deal of its own.

Under new CEO Michael Armstrong, AT&T has moved to shore up its long-distance customer base and enter local markets with January's US$11 billion acquisition of Teleport, a supplier of local services to big business customers. But analysts said AT&T must do more, and fast, or risk falling to second-tier status.

"If the SBC-Ameritech merger goes through, AT&T will no longer be the dominant Big Bell phone company," said Jeffrey Kagan, an industry consultant who runs Kagan Associates in Atlanta. "Instead of Ma Bell, AT&T will be Grandma Bell."

Repeating the mantra that the telecommunications industry is narrowing into a handful of major players capable of offering a range of integrated services, Kagan said, "They really need to do a big deal in order to remain competitive."

Among candidates frequently mentioned as possible merger partners with AT&T are GTE and Bell Atlantic. Investors favored GTE on Monday, bidding its stock up 1-1/2 points to $60.

"I don't think there was ever a significant problem with AT&T pairing off with GTE," Prudential analyst Guy Woodlief said, noting that key regulatory hurdles that hamper Baby Bell mergers do not apply to GTE, a Baby Bell-sized local phone giant that has already been freed to offer long-distance services.

A GTE spokeswoman declined to comment on any possible merger it might be considering. She said the Stamford, Connecticut-based company had made no significant announcements that might be behind the stock's rise Monday.

AT&T attacked the SBC-Ameritech deal as anti-competitive, characterizing it as "SBC's most recent attempt to expand its local monopoly to another 20 million customers in the Midwest."

Echoing the language used by regulators to quash AT&T's proposed merger with SBC a year ago, AT&T said that state and federal regulators "shouldn't even think about allowing this latest deal to go through" until SBC and Ameritech open up their local networks to greater competition.