Here's an interesting contribution to the spime
debate. I don't think it can be properly described
as an "argument" yet, because none of the
parties involved as yet quite know what we are
talking about.
I'm inclined to think that spiming is a
way for critical busybodies like myself
and Adam Greenfield to get *more* involved
in product development, rather than
less involved, as Greenfield seems to be
suggesting here.
I like to think that a year from now
this spime notion will be less inchoate,
but neologisms don't always work that
way. Does "cyberspace" mean more
now than it did in the 1980s, or less?
http://v-2.org/displayArticle.php?article_num=860
Even if Greenfield rubs you the wrong
way here, the links are good. Any article
with good links is good no matter what
the author says.