As I rehearse and refine my presentation for
Thursday, I'm extra-attuned to any new information that pertains to adult community and sexuality in virtual spaces.
A USC study of chat rooms as repositories of knowledge looks like it could have interesting results if applied to adult community.
Sex chat doesn't necessarily have objectively correct answers. But it does have "an inherent structure, including temporal ordering, references to previous statements, labeled sourcing and other clues" like any other human conversation. This, according to researchers, "opens the door to much deeper machine-generated understanding."
I'm also interested in how the researchers categorize different types of chat contributions. These obviously do not belong solely to the realm of technical conversation.
inform – corrections, descriptions, elaborations, suggestions, and answers to questions, both simple and complex
requests – requests for information or for action (e.g., commands)
social – acknowledgements, thanks, compliments, criticisms, objections, and supportive statements
Interesting implications ... thinking of how this might come in handy for online sex ed.
Press release is here, and the paper will be presented today at the Human Language Technology Conference at NYU in New York.
