Analysts: Apple Got Best of iPhone Deal

At Guayaquil in 1822, before the Spanish were finally expelled from South America, revolutionary leaders Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín held a private meeting. Bolívar went on to liberate the continent. San Martín emerged to resign command of his forces and soon retired to Europe. No-one knows what happened in that room. Likewise, […]

At Guayaquil in 1822, before the Spanish were finally expelled from South America, revolutionary leaders Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín held a private meeting. Bolívar went on to liberate the continent. San Martín emerged to resign command of his forces and soon retired to Europe. No-one knows what happened in that room.

Likewise, no-one knows what Apple and Cisco agreed to in their iPhone deal, because the terms are confidential. The Kremlinologists are nattering, however, because of one thing they did agree to: they would "explore opportunities for interoperability in the areas of security, and consumer and (business) communications."

Some suggested that Cisco's aim was not just money, but a place on the boat: they wanted some kind of hookup between their iPhones and Apple's iPhones. The thought in the statement is but a shadow of this notion, assuming it's the case.

"It looks like Cisco caved," says independent tech analyst Rob Enderle. The pledge of interoperability talks "looks like the typical promise that (Apple CEO) Steve Jobs has no intention of keeping," he says.

Negotiations over the trademark, owned by Cisco, continued for months — right up until hours before Apple announced its own iPhone. Cisco sued immediately afterwards, but whatever they got for their trouble, no-one's telling.

Analysts say Apple appears to have topped Cisco in iPhone [USA Today]