Pursuant to my post yesterday on prion diseases, commenter "Nobody" writes:
So, the "good prion/bad prion" bit was an overstatement. Here's what I was getting at, from the National Institutes of Health (which, by the way, agrees that prions are real and cause TSEs):
Point I was trying to make—perhaps ineptly—was that as I recall, the original theory was that prions got in your head and killed you up good, but then it turned out that everyone already had prion-like proteins all the time. So Prusiner—again, I may be misremembering this—modified the theory to account for "normal" noninfectious prion proteins and twisted, bad prion proteins.
Am I way off, here?
