
When discussing scientific measurements of happiness, people need to look carefully at how happiness is actually measured.
Dominic Lawson, a columnist for The Independent, takes the BBC to task for a recent piece of puffery on Vanuatu, a tiny Pacific island whose residents were deemed to be the happiest people in the world.
To arrive at Vanuatu, the NEF combined traditionally accepted measures of happiness -- self-reported satisfaction and life expectancy -- with carbon footprints. (To put it gently, the latter isn't always relevant to personal well-being; just ask a homeless person in winter.)
What's worse, the NEF didn't actually consult Vanuatuans about their personal feelings of bliss, but relied on a small, earlier phone survey.
But while these unreliable findings were widely and uncritically repeated, observes Duncan, a much better study involving the happiness of children with cerebral palsy went almost completely unreported. That study, published in The Lancet, found that -- defying the expectations of "normal" people who think that handicaps equal misery -- the children were just as happy as their classmates.
From Pentecost island to modern Britain, the futility of trying to measure happiness [The Independent]
The Happy Planet Index: An index of human well-being and environmental impact [New Economics Foundation]
Self-reported quality of life of 8-12-year-old children with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional European study [The Lancet]
Image: Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa
