
When scientists want to understand a gene or treat a disease, they start with rodents. Yet for all that scientists rely on mice, they're poorly understood. Variations in mouse genomes have been only primitively mapped, making it difficult to connect genes and complex conditions. Strains used in research are descended from a few common ancestors, making their study the equivalent of conducting ostensibly universal human studies on the descendants of a single backwoods family.
I'm working on a story about advances in mouse understanding. I can't say much right now, because the studies involved are still embargoed, but I thought I'd pass along the two articles that got me interested in mice in the first place.
The first is a science-and-society history piece from Cabinet Magazine:
Oh, that wacky Bruno Latour! I've gotta say that theory just doesn't float my boat like it did back in the fall of 2001. But most of this deals with the history of the Jackson Lab, and it's fascinating to see the path by which a few undistinguished cheese-chasers became a race of animal servants as ubiquitous in science as petri dishes and pipettes.
The Mouse's Tale: Standardized Animals in the Culture and Practice of Technoscience [Cabinet Magazine]
*
Image: NICHD*
