Change to gene theory raises new challenges for biotech - International Herald Tribune

(((Are genes a 'network' instead of chunks of GATTACA?
Boy, if so, that would explain a lot.))))

Link: Change to gene theory raises new challenges for biotech - International Herald Tribune.

Change to gene theory raises new challenges for biotech

By Denise Caruso

Published: July 3, 2007

The $73.5 billion global biotech business may soon have to grapple with a discovery that calls into question the scientific principles on which it was founded.
Last month, a consortium of scientists published findings that challenge the traditional view of the way genes function. The exhaustive, four-year effort was organized by the United States National Human Genome Research Institute and carried out by 35 groups from 80 organizations around the world. To their surprise, researchers found that the human genome might not be a "tidy collection of independent genes" after all, with each sequence of DNA linked to a single function, like a predisposition to diabetes or heart disease.

Instead, genes appear to operate in a complex network, and interact and overlap with one another and with other components in ways not yet fully understood. According to the institute, these findings will challenge scientists "to rethink some long-held views about what genes are and what they do."

Biologists have recorded these network effects for many years in other organisms. But in the world of science, discoveries often do not become part of mainstream thought until they are linked to humans.

With that link now in place, the report is likely to have repercussions far beyond the laboratory. The presumption that genes operate independently has been institutionalized since 1976, when the first biotech company was founded. In fact, it is the economic and regulatory foundation on which the entire biotechnology industry is built....

(((Given that we can't seem to fix any intellectual-property law,
I suggest reforming the laws of nature. Hey, that would work for global warming, too!)))