WiFI Draft-N Gear: Buffalo and D-Link Rated Best

N is the watchword, or, rather, the watch-letter, for newer WiFi equipment. And while the current gen is still officially a "draft" standard, PC World reports that interoperability isn’t a problem. Instead, the problem is that mixing and matching makes your network slow as a slug, and that some products are simply junk. Plus ça […]

1362802510p0221b
N is the watchword, or, rather, the watch-letter, for newer WiFi equipment. And while the current gen is still officially a "draft" standard, PC World reports that interoperability isn't a problem. Instead, the problem is that mixing and matching makes your network slow as a slug, and that some products are simply junk. Plus ça change.

"The bottom line for shoppers: Don't worry about interoperability, but be aware that performance will vary widely based on your equipment and on factors, such as nearby networks, that are beyond your control. No matter what you buy, coverage and throughput should be better than with older 802.11a/b/g gear, but look beyond the Wi-Fi Alliance's logo to choose the features you need."

Rounding up the current crop of routers and corresponding host adapters, mixing and matching in order to create a panoramic view of the marketplace, Becky Waring writes that everything worked at short range, with throughput maxing out at 130 Mbps, but often pitching as low as 6-35 Mbps when different makes were paired off. Noting a correspondence between antenna count and bandwidth, Becky recommends the Buffalo and D-Link models—with PC cards from the same make and model range, whichever you choose.

New Wi-Fi Draft Ensures Compatibility [PC World]