The Recording Industry Association of America is calling an Oregon woman a copyright pirate despite the RIAA dropping its lawsuit against her for lack of evidence.
The RIAA is claiming Tanya Andersen, 44, is a purloiner as part of its legal jockeying to avoid paying Andersen perhaps several hundred thousand dollars in legal fees. In recommending to a federal judge that defense fees should be awarded, a lower magistrate judge ruled (.pdf) the RIAA "rejected or sought to suppress evidence to the extent it tended to exonerate defendant."
The RIAA dropped the case this summer months after an analysis of the woman's hard drive came up empty. Her lawyers cried foul, and demanded fees based on what they described as a "frivolous" lawsuit.
Here's what RIAA attorney William Patton wrote in court papers (.pdf) in trying to sway an Oregon federal judge from awarding opposing legal fees:
"It makes me mad. I never had anything to do with this. It was a big mistake in identity," Andersen tells THREAT LEVEL in a telephone interview from her home in Beaverton, Oregon.
Andersen has countersued, filing a lawsuit (.pdf) seeking class action status to represent "those who were sued or were threatened with suit by defendants for file-sharing, downloading or other similar activities, who have not actually engaged in actual copyright infringement."
The lawsuit alleges "the class is comprised of many thousands of individuals."
If Andersen is awarded legal fees, the cashisha would fuel her class-action. To quote the RIAA's Patton, that "would be an extraordinary coincidence indeed…."
Full story at Wired News.
See Also:
- RIAA Sues Usenet, Decries it as Napster, Kazaa
- RIAA Rips Defendant in Nation's First Filesharing Jury Trial
- RIAA Says Thomas Shirking $222000 Payoff
- RIAA Juror: 'We Wanted to Send a Message'
- Google Unveils YouTube Copyright Filter to Mixed Reviews
- Study This: Copyright Law Hurts, Helps Economy
- Happy Anniversary Pirates: 20000 Copyright Lawsuits and Counting
