
Much of the outcry over James Watson's low estimation of black intelligence centers on remarks he made in a Times of London interview, but he was quite open about his views in his new book, Avoid Boring People: Lessons From a Life in Science. There he wrote,
How many book reviewers actually picked up on that? To the best of my Googling, only the Associated Press. The Boston Globe, Technology Review, Decatur Daily, MSNBC, Publisher's Weekly, San Diego Union Tribune, St. Louis Post-Dispatch and Seed all missed it. (If you've seen it reviewed elsewhere, send me a link.) Given the realities of book review logistics and economics -- reviewers rarely have time or economic incentive to actually read more than a chapter or two -- this isn't surprising or unforgivable, but it does give the resulting furor a bad aftertaste. "We're shocked -- shocked!" But we shouldn't be.
Coming tomorrow: more of James Watson's views on breeding, gays and women; the danger of looking for scientific explanations to social problems; and a shout out to Rosalind Franklin.
Like this post? Then Digg our James Watson controversy frontpage.
See Also:
- Watson Rediscovers 1940s Attitudes Towards Race
- British Science Museum Wimps Out on Watson
- More on James "Black People Are Stupid" Watson
- The Science and Assumptions Behind Watson's Views on Blacks
- The Dog Ate Our Book Reviews: Watson's Book Given Free Pass by Press
- Watson's Mistake: Favoring Science, Ignoring History
- James Watson Suspended From Lab, but Not For Being a Sexist Hater of Fat People
- Angry IQ Tester: Watson's Critics Are Socialists!
- The Overlap Between Eugenics and a Belief in Superior White Intelligence
- Watson Resigns From Lab: Last Thoughts on a Clouded Legacy
