Opponents of a public health-insurance plan pose two main objections: that it will create an 'unlevel playing field' that will harm the private market for insurance (an odd objection, since that playing field already tilts quite sharply away from patients' pockets and health and toward the wallets of the health-insurance industry); and that government involvement will raise costs.
These objections seem to hold sway to the degree we limit our discussion to what already exists in the U.S. As with squabbles about the problems with our educational (non)system, the picture gets clearer if we step back and test this argument against the larger world.
In an article in Forbes, Bruce Bartlett brings some clarity by doing just that:
Will government involvement drive up health-care costs?
As with squabbles about the problems with our educational (non)system, the picture on health-care reform gets clearer if we step back and test this argument against the larger world.