For months, administration and intelligence officials have assured us that the drone war in Pakistan has the jihadists on the run -- decimating their leadership, and keeping the rest looking over their shoulders. But there's been little independent verification of what effect the remotely-piloted planes are really having; journalists and aid workers are kept far from the Predator and Reaper fire zone. The* New York Times' *David Rohde offers what I believe is the first inside look at the drone campaign, from the militants' point of view. It's part of his sensational series, documenting his kidnapping by the Taliban. And yes, he says, the robotic aircraft have the guerrillas spooked.
But, in the next breath, Rohde also validates some of the criticisms of the robotic assaults -- that the drones are handing the Taliban a propaganda win, and driving fresh jihadists to their ranks.
"The drones killed many senior commanders and hindered their operations. Yet the Taliban were able to garner recruits in their aftermath by exaggerating the number of civilian casualties," he writes. "The strikes also created a paranoia among the Taliban. They believed that a network of local informants guided the missiles. Innocent civilians were rounded up, accused of working as American spies and then executed."
[Photo: Noah Shachtman]
ALSO:
