*I can tell (without even bothering to look, frankly) that these smoke-blowing fanatics are somehow in the pay of the Australian coal industry. The thing that interests me about this weird screed is that it finally talks so openly and frankly about killing large numbers of people in order to avert climate change. I've been expecting this for quite some time.
*From a market-centric perspective, it's long been obvious that mass murder is the cheapest, most commercially effective, most final solution to planetary carbon emissions. People still moan about far-fetched geo-engineering schemes and unwieldy carbon-markets when carbon emissions could be cut in half overnight by simply killing half of everybody.
*If Hitler, Mao or Stalin, guys who used to run half the planet, were confronted with a greenhouse climate crisis, of course that's the option they would have chosen. They would have pointed fingers at Jews, kulaks, Confucians, whoever, thrown a few show-trials to get people worked up, and then just butchered huge numbers of innocents. "No people, no problems," as Stalin used to say.
*Very obviously, if there's any severe climate crisis – the kind where there's millions of Okies fleeing a dustbowl, or hundreds of millions of Bangladeshis knee-deep in salt water – it would take the 21st century maybe six weeks to return to this classic 20th century method of political engineering. It's written all over our history books. Nothing far-fetched about that, it's a proven technology.
*Finally, though, I'm cruising through the ol' email here, and Copenhagen has gotten potent enough that its enemies accuse the delegates of organizing a genocide. Well, if they do fail to organize anything convincing in Copenhagen, then some feats of genocide are very likely. Copenhagen is a feeble effort by the "international community" to keep up a pretense of moral decency and some political oversight of a deteriorating situation. If there's no political solution to climate change, and if the climate crisis starts further destabilizing states, of course there's gonna be genocide. Take Sudan, Rwanda, Somalia, and multiply that by a factor of ten. It's "unthinkable" and very shocking to propriety, but it's not like it doesn't happen already.
*A screed of this kind is like the first robin in Springtime for Hitler. The climate genocide meme is finally on the loose. The unthinkable edges toward the thinkable, there's a visible move in the slider-bar. Climate genocide doesn't belong to any cult, party, or philosophy in particular, because anybody's capable of genocide, and the climate is everybody's problem. "Climate, genocide, climate-genocide, Climate Genocide." Of course they'll all be claiming that someone else is planning this evil thing, but they'll all be talking about it. They're making it talkable. Henceforth, you're bound to hear more, and more, and more.
*The next logical step will be urging some "pre-emptive" climate genocide, in order to avert somebody else's theoretically much worse act of climate genocide.
Citizens Electoral Council of Australia (((I'm guessing three guys and a modem)))
Media Release 14th of December 2009
Craig Isherwood‚ National Secretary
PO Box 376‚ COBURG‚ VIC 3058
Phone: 03 9354 0544 Fax: 03 9354 0166
Email: [email protected]
Website: http://www.cecaust.com.au
British admit: Copenhagen intends genocide‚ World Government
The official British two-pronged policy for the Copenhagen Conference is now out‚ in explicit language. It consists of: 1) massive population genocide‚ on a scale that would make Adolf Hitler blush‚ and 2) the establishment of a world government with policing powers to cap carbon emissions‚ to tax every advanced sector nation to the extent of two per cent of GDP per year‚ and to impose a global levy on all global financial transactions‚ among other draconian provisions.
Regarding the genocide‚ the Fabian Society’s London School of Economics‚ the anchor of the Fabian Gordon Brown government (the chief organiser of the Copenhagen Conference)‚ has produced a study for Copenhagen‚ released by the British government-backed Optimum Population Trust (OPT)‚ calling for the reduction of world population by between three to five billion people between now and 2050. This flagrant call for mass extermination is based on the argument that the single greatest cause of (non-existent) global warming is overpopulation‚ and that the most “cost-effective” cure for global warming is radical population reduction. This is not just the “opinion” of one way-out nutty group: The Copenhagen conference is itself being sponsored by the U.N.‚ and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) tapped the OPT’s director‚ Roger Martin‚ to present the UNFPA’s own State of World Population 2009 report on the 16th November‚ in the lead-up to Copenhagen.
Former Thatcher government adviser Lord Christopher Monckton blew the whistle on the proposed World Government on the Alex Jones radio show on 9th December. Monckton‚ who is in Copenhagen attending the UN climate summit‚ said that when he attempted to obtain a copy of the 180-page current draft of the negotiating text agreement‚ he was initially rebuffed before he threatened an international diplomatic incident unless the document was forthcoming. “I insisted‚ and it took about 10 minutes and they consulted each other with three or four of them arguing over it—none of them would produce the document … I said I know this treaty exists because this is what the conference is all about‚” said Monckton.
Monckton went on to elaborate precisely how the 180-page treaty draft would establish a world government‚ replete with around 700 separate bureaucracies‚ and powers of taxation‚ inspection and enforcement over individual nation-states. Developed nations‚ for instance‚ will be taxed to pay the World Bank to fund developing nations‚ but such funds will only be forthcoming for those developing nations if they meet stringent criteria. The treaty also outlines‚ said Monckton‚ “penalties or fines for non-compliance”‚ in developed countries‚ and the creation of an international police force to “enforce its will by imposing unlimited financial penalties on any countries whose performance under this treaty they don’t like”‚ adding that that it amounted to a total global government takeover on an “unimaginable scale”.
Briefed on Monckton’s findings‚ American statesman and physical economist Lyndon LaRouche (((when Alex Jones is rockin' the mike, you have to wonder when LaRouche will show up))) charged‚ “What this 180-page document represents is a policy worse than Hitler‚ which is the policy behind the Copenhagen summit. And the people who are proposing this‚ therefore‚ are subject to trial for genocide. Anybody who proposes this‚ becomes subject to a subsequent trial for genocide‚ by a future Nuremberg proceeding. Beware! Do not propose this; you may be subject to a future Nuremberg proceeding!”
LaRouche further called on China and India‚ who are coming under excruciating pressure to capitulate‚ to stick to their positions going into Copenhagen and to walk out if faced with mandatory emissions restrictions: “Stick to what they agreed to; stick to it! Don’t worry about the differences; stick to it! Screw this thing up! Destroy it now‚ and get rid of it!
“The issue here is that some governments are in a sense ducking the issue‚ pretending to accept conditions which they intend to defy in fact. But the point is‚ then they will become targets for destruction on that basis. It’s better to defy than to try to evade. Defiance promotes unity; compromise promotes destruction.”
Click here for a free copy of the Aug/Sept 2009 New Citizen, “Carbon Trading is Hitler-style Genocide”.
Click here to join the CEC as a member.
Click here to refer others to receive regular email updates from the Citizens Electoral Council of Australia.
