*It's always something. From RISKS DIGEST:
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:04:21 PDT
From: "Peter G. Neumann"
Subject: RFID zapper made from a disposable camera! (Eurekalert)
[Thanks to Ken Nitz. PGN]
Safer swiping while voting and globetrotting: Tel Aviv University security
expert finds security holes in America's passports and 'smart cards'
http://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/21697.php?from=158414
Since 2007, every new U.S. passport has been outfitted with a computer
chip. Embedded in the back cover of the passport, the "e-passport" contains
biometric data, electronic fingerprints and pictures of the holder, and a
wireless radio frequency identification (RFID) transmitter.
Although the system was designed to operate at close range, hackers were
able to access it from afar — until research by Prof. Avishai Wool of Tel
Aviv University's Blavatnik School of Computer Sciences helped ensure that
the computer chip in American e-passports could be read only when the
passport is opened. The research has been cited by organizations including
the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Now, a new study from Prof. Wool finds serious security drawbacks in similar
chips that are being embedded in credit, debit and "smart" cards. The
vulnerabilities of this electronic approach – and the vulnerability of the
private information contained in the chips – are becoming more acute.
Using simple devices constructed from $20 disposable cameras and copper
cooking-gas pipes, Prof. Wool and his students have demonstrated how easily the cards' radio frequency (RF) signals can be disrupted. The work will be presented at the IEEE RFID conference in Orlando, FL, this month.
More than one way to hack a chip
Prof. Wool's most recent research centers on the new "e-voting" technology
being implemented in Israel. "We show how the Israeli government's new
system based on the RFID chip is a very risky approach for security
reasons. It allows hackers who are not much more than amateurs to break the system," Prof. Wool explains. "One way to catch hackers, criminals and
terrorists is by thinking like one." (((Or, you might think like a bunch of Mossad agents going to ice somebody in Dubai, but obviously that would be a completely different kind of thinking, of no relevance to the issue of cloning passports, or anything.)))
http://www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/21698.php?from=158414
In his lab, Prof. Wool constructed an attack mechanism —- an RFID
"zapper"– from a disposable camera. Replacing the camera's bulb with an
RFID antenna, he showed how the EMP (electro-magnetic pulse) signal produced by the camera could destroy the data on nearby RFID chips such as ballots, credit cards or passports. "In a voting system, this would be the equivalent of burning ballots – but without the fire and smoke," he says.
Another attack involves jamming the radio frequencies that read the
card. Though the card's transmissions are designed to be read by antennae no more than two feet distant, Prof. Wool and his students demonstrated how the transmissions can be jammed by a battery-powered transmitter 20 yards away.
This means that an attacker can disable an entire voting station from
across the street. Similarly, a terror group could "jam" passport systems at
U.S. border controls relatively easily, he suggests.
The most insidious type of attack is the "relay attack." In this scenario,
the voting station assumes it is communicating with an RFID ballot near it
– but it's easy for a hacker or terrorist to make equipment that can trick
it. Such an attack can be used to transfer votes from party to party and
nullify votes to undesired parties, Prof. Wool demonstrates. A relay attack
may also be used to allow a terrorist to cross a border using someone else's
e-passport.
How to make "smart cards" smarter
"All the new technologies we have now seem really cool. But when anything
like this first comes onto the market, it will be fraught with security
holes," Prof. Wool warns. "In America the Federal government poured a lot of
money into e-voting, only to discover later that the deployed systems were
vulnerable. Over the last few years we've seen a trend back towards systems
with paper trails as a result."
But there are some small steps that can be taken to make smart cards
smarter, says Prof. Wool. The easiest one is to shield the card with
something as simple as aluminium foil to insulate the e-transmission. In the
case of e-voting, a ballot box could be made of conductive materials. The
State Department has already taken Prof. Wool's advice: since 2007, they've
also added conductive fibres to the back of every American passport.
(((Or, you could just put a bunch of tinfoil on your head. That might at least help with falling volcanic ashes, or something.)))