My scoring criteria ran 1 through 4 on five tests—sand, cat litter, Cheerios, general vacuuming, and handheld mode—with 4 representing the best performance and 1 being the lowest. The V10 Konical walked away with a 14 out of 20, while the V15 came behind it with a 12 out of 20. The V10 came in second overall out of five Dyson vacuums, with only the Gen5Detect beating it with a score of 17. The V10 pulls ahead of the Gen5Detect if you’re looking for add-ons, though, as the V10 will be compatible with Dyson’s self-emptying docking station that will release later this year.
While testing, I was particularly impressed with how well it picked up sand for its lower suction power, and it did a great job sucking up an intentional mess of Cheerios I created. I was less impressed with the hard floor results, but since the V10 doesn’t work with the Fluffy Optic head like Dyson’s high-end vacuums, it was never going to be as effective as vacuums that can switch to a head made for that surface. Still, it’s not bad—it was still able to vacuum up the litter I scattered on hard floors as a test. It just needed a couple of passes instead of a single pass to get it all, and it didn’t shove it into a pile like the cheaper V8 Cyclone did. The V10 does well in handheld mode and on carpet and rugs, and it felt a little easier to push around on a low-pile rug than the V8 did with its Digital Motorbar head.
Overall, I’d recommend this vacuum if you’re set on a Dyson and have a home full of mostly carpets and rugs. It’s a better buy than going for the cheaper V8, and I found it a better all-around experience than some of the more expensive Dyson vacuums out there. I still wouldn’t call it better than the Shark PowerDetect, but if you’re set on a Dyson, this is the best buy on the affordable end of Dyson’s scale.
Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.
Comments
Back to top