Skip to main content

The Big Interview: Silicon Valley Is Spending Millions to Stop One of Its Own

Would you vote a former Palantir employee into Congress? Maybe your first instinct is no. But what if you knew that a super PAC, funded by some of Silicon Valley’s wealthiest and most powerful people, including Palantir’s own cofounder, was in heated agreement with you? We’re talking about New York Assembly member Alex Bores, a Democrat running for Congress in a crowded primary that also includes Kennedy scion and chronically online influencer Jack Schlossberg, TV commentator George Conway, and New York assemblyman Micah Lasher. Bores, 35, has a master’s degree in computer science and worked in Big Tech—at Palantir, specifically—before turning to politics and winning a 2022 New York state assembly race. But while Bores’ background is in tech, that doesn’t mean he supports how the industry is doing its job. Bores is a vocal proponent of rigorous AI regulation and cosponsored New York’s RAISE Act, which became law in 2025 and requires major AI firms to implement and publish safety protocols for their models, among other guardrails. Bores’ AI stance has made him a target for some of Big Tech’s leaders: In late 2025, a super PAC called Leading the Future—bankrolled by OpenAI’s Greg Brockman, Palantir cofounder Joe Lonsdale, and VC firm Andreessen Horowitz, among others—launched an aggressive campaign to thwart Bores’ primary run. In particular, the group takes issue with Bores’ regulatory approach to the AI industry, which they described as “ideological and politically motivated legislation that would handcuff not only New York’s, but the entire country’s, ability to lead on AI jobs and innovation,” in a previous statement to WIRED. WIRED’s Global Editorial Director Katie Drummond sat down with Bores in early April, about 10 weeks before what’s presumably a decisive primary (New York’s 12th District consistently votes blue). They talked about that Palantir gig, why so few lawmakers seem to understand the tech they’re supposed to regulate, and how it feels to be on the receiving end of PAC-funded attack leaflets and text messages … about yourself.

Released on 04/14/2026

Transcript

Let's say we fast forward, you win this election.

You look at who's in the White House, President Trump,

you look at the level of tech literacy that, quite frankly,

you would be surrounded by, which is minimal to none,

if I'm being blunt about it.

How are you gonna get anything done

when it comes to AI regulation in the next couple of years?

What could that potentially look like?

What's your ideal scenario?

How do you fight that fight and get some wins?

Actually, I think this is an area

that I am most optimistic around bipartisan support.

I mean, I agree with Josh Hawley on basically nothing.

[laughs] Same.

Except that AI could really use some regulation.

Yeah.

And, like, I did a talk with Marsha Blackburn.

Again, someone I don't agree with on much,

but, at least, you know,

take Trump out of the picture for a second,

I'll bring him back in, but on members of Congress,

and certainly on just normal voters across both parties,

survey after survey shows people want there

to be reasonable guardrails,

especially around kids is a big focus,

around labor is a big focus.

I actually think we could move forward on a lot of ideas,

and you're seeing it play out at the state level, right?

So my RAISE Act passed

with bipartisan majorities in both houses,

and the final passage was nearly unanimous,

I think there was one no vote.

And on, even other bills that I've done

on data training transparency,

where we have transparency standards

on what goes into, the data that goes into a model,

that passed unanimously last year.

You're seeing red states move forward with bills,

so the ability for bipartisanship on this issue is there

if you can be thoughtful in building those coalitions.